G+ arhiva
G+ ARHIVA
[1]      «      5   |   6   |   7   |   8   |   9   |   10   |   11   |   12   |   13      »      [181]

The left has literally been taken over by evil. Yeah, about the time it was c...
- 2018-10-11T08:05:38+0000 - Updated: 2018-10-11T08:05:38+0000
The left has literally been taken over by evil. Yeah, about the time it was created. The left was always about killing people based on some socio-political theory, from the French revolution onwards. The theory is that the masses are oppressed by those in power, and by creating a revolution and removing those in power you'll get heaven on earth.
The French revolution - let's kill the King, the nobles and the priests and we'll get heaven on earth. Result: slaughterhouse.
The communists - let's kill the rich people, take everything they have and give it to the poor people, which will end oppression and produce heaven on earth. Result: slaughterhouse, poverty, oppression.
The national socialists - let's kill all the inferior races that oppress and limit us, and we'll get heaven on earth. Result: slaughterhouse, genocide, world war.
So yeah, the Left has been an instrument of evil, since the day it started. It literally looks like something Satan thought of.

Billionaire Minecraft Creator Says The Left Has Literally Been Taken Over by Evil

Shared with: Public
- 2018-10-11T21:57:09+0000
Human shackles
If only leaders, governments, and a few people develop social systems
If only leaders, governments, and a few people formulate and define everything
Then people, humans, everyone, from birth to death
Everything that comes into contact with, learns, understands, communicates, communicates, studies, and explores
Will always be led by leaders, governments, and a few
Control, restraint, limitations, corruption, corrosion, influence, deception, misleading?
Then do people, human beings, and everyones thoughts and culture have real freedom?
Then, do people, human beings, and everyones ideas and ethics have real freedom?
Then are people, human beings, and everyones beliefs and beliefs truly free to speak?
Then the people, human beings, the soul and the will of everyone have real freedom to speak of?
Then are people, human beings, everyones life and life truly free to speak?
......




Yeah, everybody is all about having a great life and having fun. Except they ...
- 2018-10-06T15:21:33+0000 - Updated: 2018-10-06T15:21:33+0000
Yeah, everybody is all about having a great life and having fun. Except they are lying.
Shared with: Public




Google+ post
Shared with: Public




Well, it's not like GNU/Linux was not a leftist cesspool from the beginni...
- 2018-09-28T16:44:24+0000 - Updated: 2018-09-28T16:44:24+0000
Well, it's not like GNU/Linux was not a leftist cesspool from the beginning, so I don't understand the level of consternation over this, essentially slight, escalation. Just look at Ubuntu. Translated to English it means communism. Stallman is a communist, Torvalds is a communist, and now that the SJW cult took over the communist scene they also took over Linux, as if that were not expected.
Shared with: Public, Danijel Turina, Ermin Hasičević
- 2018-09-29T11:42:54+0000
And I hear people bitching that now with the introduction of CoC development of Linux would not be based on a meritocracy but SJW bullshit ... so what does introduction of CoC means for Linux ... development of Linux kernel would be now inclusive for all demographics but not for white heterosexual European geek males?! And Linus doesnt get opportunity to insult people no matter if theres a good reason behind it or not?!
- 2018-09-29T11:52:34+0000
+Ermin Hasičević Well, in case of somethng else this might be a big deal, but with Linux Im not sure, because it already failed because of communism, and this is just about how the corpse will be disposed of. Yes, it supposedly had meritocracy, but with rewards measured in terms of ego trip and not tangible benefits (money). The Soviet Union had the same thing.
- 2018-09-29T11:59:39+0000
And btw, in the Western civilization we have karma points awarded to those whose contributions we find useful, and in exchange for goods and services. They are called money. I would recommend all communists to learn about those, lest they be doomed to repeat the mistakes from the past.
- 2018-09-30T18:30:08+0000
+



What I find interesting is that none of Dave's advice works in most of th...
- 2018-09-27T10:11:06+0000 - Updated: 2018-09-27T10:11:06+0000
What I find interesting is that none of Dave's advice works in most of the world. If you cannot rely on a dynamic stock market in a rising economy, saving money is actually deadly because inflation eats it, and investing in stock is deadly because the growth is usually negative and most investors routinely get wiped out. I live in Croatia and I just don't see any sense in investing money in the stock market. It's not America, and even in America you occasionally get wiped out. In Yugoslavia, everybody who saved money got wiped out by hyperinflation. That's the reality of world outside America. The only way to save money and grow it is to build your own business and be successful at it.
Shared with: Public




Yes, the ugliness of feminism.
Shared with: Public




The most horrible thing about this pile of garbage is that it was founded by ...
- 2018-09-23T06:42:26+0000 - Updated: 2018-09-23T06:42:26+0000
The most horrible thing about this pile of garbage is that it was founded by the Gates foundation. Essentially, Bill Gates allowed the lever of his financial power to be used as a lever to subvert the foundations of the very system that gave him power.
Shared with: Public




Google+ post
- 2018-09-23T06:37:09+0000 - Updated: 2018-09-23T06:37:09+0000
Shared with: Public




It's amazing how people don't understand that the concept of "re...
- 2018-09-23T07:37:48+0000 - Updated: 2018-09-23T07:40:25+0000
It's amazing how people don't understand that the concept of "resource" is a function of one's respective technological level. In the Bronze age, the technological resources were copper and zinc. The word for Cyprus originates from the word for copper. In the stone age, oops, the copper was not a resource somehow, I guess why. Then later, copper was not particularly valuable because bronze was obsolete, until electricity was discovered, and then suddenly the copper again became a valuable resource. It has nothing to do with copper, it has everything to do with brainpower.
Before Haber-Bosch method of making fertilisers, the natural deposits of bird shit were a valuable resource; "guano" was mined from Chile and exported by ships, and it was a whole industry in Chile. But when people learned to make artificial bird shit, Chilean saltpeter suddenly stopped being a resource and the mines were abandoned.
Also, the vast lithium deposits in the Atacama deserts were not a resource in the 19th century, and suddenly became a thing when people figured how to use it for making batteries for phones, laptops and cars. Now let's imagine what will happen to the worth of all the lithium in the Chilean deserts if people figure out how to make better batteries without lithium, from carbon nanotubes or graphene, for instance? It will return to the 19th century values.
So no, the resources not only don't make you wealthy and technologically advanced, they don't even exist as a thing outside the context of brainpower.
Shared with: Public




Google+ post
- 2018-09-20T13:52:49+0000 - Updated: 2018-09-20T13:52:49+0000
Shared with: Public



[1]      «      5   |   6   |   7   |   8   |   9   |   10   |   11   |   12   |   13      »      [181]
toggle